Who speaks for the Nats?

Presumably the Daily Post's coverage of the Aled Cottle e-mail affair is boosting the page views of Natwatch.co.uk, and therefore this must have contributed to the high number of recent postings.

Anyway.

Price4President is prioritising his own safety, and Natwatch2 assumes that threatening e-mails have sent to Natwatch Towers.

P4P self-righteously proclaims:

But nobody - and we mean nobody - has the right to threaten violence against us just because they don't like our politics.

This comes as a shock to Natwatch2, especially after reading a number of previous posts by Price4President suggesting interesting uses for Nats.